British Courts Not Supporting British Design
(Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd – 2011)
“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes”
- Sir Robin Jacob , Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd  EWCA Civ 1206, 27 October 2011
The Court of Appeal has upheld an earlier High Court decision in Dyson v Vax. It agreed that Vax had not infringed Dyson’s intellectual property by designing and producing the Mach Zen vacuum cleaner. Although it looked quite similar the court concluded that it “produced a different overall impression on the informed user” (this being the test for infringement) and was therefore not in breach.
Why is this decision important? Like all registered design owners Dyson has the exclusive right to use its registered design for a maximum of 25 years following registration. Dyson registered the design in 1994 so had thought that no competitors would be able to make a similar looking and functioning vacuum cleaner until at least 2019. What this decision has shown, however, is that simply registering the overall design of a product is no longer enough. Such a broad registration will not give sufficient protection to those aspects of a product that really do require safeguarding. Although the products were clearly similar in function and design the court concluded that “what really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes”, and in this instance it saw too many differences. Overall, the appeal judges characterized the registered design as producing a visual impression that is “smooth, curving and elegant” whilst that of the Mach Zen is “rugged, angular and industrial”. This, it concluded, gave a “different overall impression on the informed user”.
Myers Lister Price Corporate and Commercial Department: Intellectual Property, offer a full registered design service, from advising on the strengths of a registered design application, through the registration itself and onto protection of the design and enforcement of the intellectual property rights. As we have learnt from the Dyson case, simply registering an overall design of a product may no longer be enough to protect the product from being copied. We would advise our clients (as the UK and EU laws allow) to not only protect the design of a whole product but to also consider protecting specific parts of a product. Our experienced intellectual property team are on hand to advise what aspects of a design may be worth protecting and how this can best be done for you.
If you have any intellectual property enquiries please get in touch with Stephen Attree or Awena Parry, our Intellectual Property Solicitors at Myers Lister Price Solicitors on 0845 0738 445 or email email@example.com
Latest MLP Solicitors News
- December 5th, 2013Small Business Saturday
- December 4th, 2013How much inheritance tax will I pay?
The number of estates affected by Inheritance Tax is set to double from the current level of 21,000 per year to 42,000 in 2016/17. According to accountancy experts, this increase … Read more
- November 29th, 2013Always Read the Fine Print
US citizen Jen Palmer recently found herself subject to a $3,500 fine for posting a negative online review. In 2008 Jen Palmer ordered some items from KlearGear.com. After the items … Read more
- November 11th, 2013MLP Injury Lawyers and MLP Solicitors LLP – Providing successful solutions for the Healthcare Sector
Services we offer to Healthcare Professionals include:
- Quicker access to diagnostics, treatment and care for your patients
- Medico-legal Report writing
- Drafting Partnership Agreements
- Planning for Retirement, Wealth Management, Estate and … Read more
- November 11th, 2013What is a chain of representation?
Do you know what a ‘chain of representation’ is? A bunch of lawyers linking arms? A special piece of jewellery? Not quite. It’s a legal term for the situation where … Read more
- November 11th, 2013The dangers of non-disclosure
It has been reported that a father has been committed to prison for contempt of court for failing to provide details of his financial circumstances in an application for financial … Read more
- October 28th, 2013Cadbury’s vs Nestle for the colour purple…
After a tough battle at the Court of Appeal and years of battling back and forth with Nestle, Cadbury has now lost its trade mark for the colour purple which … Read more
- October 28th, 2013Constructive Dismissal Law Update
The latest case in constructive dismissal law says that in order to successfully bring a claim for constructive dismissal, the contractual breach by the employer does not necessarily need to … Read more
- October 23rd, 2013Man attacks wife in court
It has recently been reported in the press that a man has been convicted of attacking his wife in court just as judgement was about to be given in a … Read more
- October 22nd, 2013Don’t Pay Too Much Inheritance Tax
Do you know what happens to your pension on death? If you have a taxable estate and your pension passes to your spouse then the proceeds of your pension will … Read more
- October 17th, 2013Don’t forget your business when planning a will
We have been speaking to a lot of business owners recently and asking them what their plans are for their business, in the event of their deaths. It is surprising … Read more
- October 17th, 2013Help to Buy – Can it help you?
The Help to Buy scheme introduced on 1 April 2013 is expected to help up to 74,000 people purchase a property if they can raise a 5% deposit and arrange … Read more
- October 15th, 2013Top judge claims divorce law “not fit for purpose”
In a speech to family lawyers, Lord Justice Coleridge has called for a “root and branch” overhaul of divorce law and procedure. He commented that
“…current divorce and financial provision … Read more
- October 14th, 2013Who owns the sound in Spotify?
The Ministry of Sound (“MOS”) are bringing a claim against Spotify for refusing to delete playlists put together by its users which replicate Ministry of Sound compilations. MOS are now … Read more
- October 9th, 2013A new approach for financial settlements
One of the most common causes of worry and frustration for divorcing or separating couples is the length of time it can take to negotiate a financial settlement. This can … Read more
- October 9th, 2013Flooding – Don’t Get Caught Stranded
The Environment Agency estimates that one in six homes in England are at risk from flooding with land increasingly at risk from different types of flooding. Law Society chief executive … Read more
- October 2nd, 2013Billion-dollar Trust Dispute Comes to an End
Gina Rinehart, Australia’s richest person, has agreed to give up control of a trust fund containing company shares worth billions of dollars following a long-running feud with her children. The … Read more
- September 19th, 2013Property Expenses – be prepared!
When purchasing a property, there are certain expenses involved you may not have considered. For example, there are certain searches that need to be made in regards to your future … Read more
- September 12th, 2013Income tax on joint property
The First-tier Tax Tribunal recently held that a married couple’s agreement to pay to the wife rental income from a jointly owned property did not prevent the husband from being … Read more
- August 30th, 2013Employee Shareholder Status Update
On 15 August 2013, HMRC updated its Share and Assets Valuation Manual (SVM) to take account of the implementation of employee shareholder employment status which is due to be introduced … Read more
- August 29th, 2013Young globe-trotters set to be winners with inheritance tax changes
Globalisation is leading more young professionals into international work and they look set to be the winners in changes in inheritance tax rules in the UK, designed to reflect the … Read more