British Courts Not Supporting British Design
(Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd – 2011)
“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes”
- Sir Robin Jacob , Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd  EWCA Civ 1206, 27 October 2011
The Court of Appeal has upheld an earlier High Court decision in Dyson v Vax. It agreed that Vax had not infringed Dyson’s intellectual property by designing and producing the Mach Zen vacuum cleaner. Although it looked quite similar the court concluded that it “produced a different overall impression on the informed user” (this being the test for infringement) and was therefore not in breach.
Why is this decision important? Like all registered design owners Dyson has the exclusive right to use its registered design for a maximum of 25 years following registration. Dyson registered the design in 1994 so had thought that no competitors would be able to make a similar looking and functioning vacuum cleaner until at least 2019. What this decision has shown, however, is that simply registering the overall design of a product is no longer enough. Such a broad registration will not give sufficient protection to those aspects of a product that really do require safeguarding. Although the products were clearly similar in function and design the court concluded that “what really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes”, and in this instance it saw too many differences. Overall, the appeal judges characterized the registered design as producing a visual impression that is “smooth, curving and elegant” whilst that of the Mach Zen is “rugged, angular and industrial”. This, it concluded, gave a “different overall impression on the informed user”.
Myers Lister Price Corporate and Commercial Department: Intellectual Property, offer a full registered design service, from advising on the strengths of a registered design application, through the registration itself and onto protection of the design and enforcement of the intellectual property rights. As we have learnt from the Dyson case, simply registering an overall design of a product may no longer be enough to protect the product from being copied. We would advise our clients (as the UK and EU laws allow) to not only protect the design of a whole product but to also consider protecting specific parts of a product. Our experienced intellectual property team are on hand to advise what aspects of a design may be worth protecting and how this can best be done for you.
If you have any intellectual property enquiries please get in touch with Stephen Attree or Awena Parry, our Intellectual Property Solicitors at Myers Lister Price Solicitors on 0845 0738 445 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Latest Myers Lister Price Solicitors News
- May 22nd, 2013The Patent Box – a gift for all innovative companies.
- May 21st, 2013Intellectual Property Bill published
- May 16th, 2013Crowdsourcing – beware of the pitfalls.
- May 16th, 2013Did you know that you do not have to use your insurance company’s choice of solicitor to pursue a personal injury claim?
- May 13th, 2013MLP Injury Lawyers has successfully recovered over £30,000 in injury compensation.
- May 10th, 2013MLP Injury Lawyers has successfully recovered £21,000 in injury compensation…
- May 8th, 2013Great news for Cheshire!
- May 7th, 2013Great result for SEONext
- May 3rd, 2013Employee Shareholders will now become law – Royal Assent is expected today and BIS intends to implement this new, third, type of employment status in autumn 2013.
- May 3rd, 2013Employment Tribunal fees to be introduces later this year…
- May 2nd, 2013Developments on Employee-Owned Companies
- April 29th, 2013Could a franchise be your ideal fresh start?
- April 29th, 2013Are you being treated fairly?
- April 29th, 2013The latest on Employee Shareholder Status
- April 17th, 2013Will a new “employee shareholder” status be introduced?
- April 12th, 2013The Courts Arrive on YouTube
- April 9th, 2013The death of legal aid – there are alternatives.
- April 9th, 2013Not so happy bunny now…
- April 2nd, 2013April fool?
- March 25th, 2013But it’s my name too!
- March 21st, 20132,150 AstraZeneca Job Losses reported at Alderley Park, Cheshire
- March 20th, 2013Pension Pitfalls
- March 20th, 2013Have you been TUPE’d???
- March 15th, 2013Contact a dispute resolution solicitor before agreeing any settlement.
- March 13th, 2013Intellectual property solicitors settle legal dispute for the Fred Perry fashion label.
- March 13th, 2013Council Tax Rise To Hit Beneficiaries Of Estates
- March 12th, 2013Use a commercial solicitor to keep your business compliant.
- March 12th, 2013Cash is King and Europe agrees. The new law comes into effect on 16th March.
- March 11th, 2013TUPE, or not TUPE? That is the question…
- March 11th, 2013Commercial law advice from MLP Solicitors.
MLP Solicitors in the news
- November 1st, 2012MLP Rebrand in Manchester Law Society Messenger
- October 23rd, 2012MLP Solicitors launches MediaCity office
- October 22nd, 2012Digital brand blunders
- October 17th, 2012Legal firm launches North West Air Ambulance support fund
- October 16th, 2012How SMEs can Prepare for Pension Reform
- October 15th, 2012A Beginners Guide to Commercial Property Investment
- September 14th, 2012MLP Solicitors Bag New Salford Office at MediaCityUK
- July 6th, 2012Gatekeep: How to pitch to Rachel Chenery at Myers Lister Price (Wealth Manager online)
- July 5th, 2012MLP Solicitors advises on business sale
- June 21st, 2010Personal Injury - Negligence